Comparison of the effects of anaerobic and microaerophilic incubation on resistance of Helicobacter pylori to metronidazole

Citation
Ym. Abdi et al., Comparison of the effects of anaerobic and microaerophilic incubation on resistance of Helicobacter pylori to metronidazole, J MED MICRO, 48(4), 1999, pp. 407-410
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Microbiology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00222615 → ACNP
Volume
48
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
407 - 410
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-2615(199904)48:4<407:COTEOA>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
To assess the influence of incubation conditions on the resistance of Helic obacter pylori this study compared the effect of micro-aerophilic and anaer obic incubation followed by micro-aerophilic incubation on the measurement of metronidazole resistance of 102 H, pylori isolates, by both disk diffusi on and Epsilometer (E)-tests, Anaerobic incubation for 24 h before micro-ae rophilic incubation for 48 h consistently increased metronidazole activity in both assay methods. Although statistically significant, this was microbi ologically less significant, as only 4 of 102 isolates gave discrepant read ings (all four were resistant in micro-aerophilic conditions but susceptibl e in anaerobic/micro-aerophilic conditions), In all four cases variation wa s by a few millimeters in zone size (i.e., all were close to the cut-off po int). There was 100% agreement between disk diffusion and E-test results. O f 104 observations (52 duplicate assays: 13 strains, two atmospheric condit ions, two methods of determining resistance) there was 100% intra-observer and inter-observer agreement with regard to susceptibility and resistance s tatus for both E-test and disk diffusion methods, Anaerobic incubation foll owed by micro-aerophilic incubation had little effect on the estimation of prevalence of metronidazole resistance and seemed to add little, if any, si gnificant advantage over micro-aerophilic incubation alone.