Ym. Abdi et al., Comparison of the effects of anaerobic and microaerophilic incubation on resistance of Helicobacter pylori to metronidazole, J MED MICRO, 48(4), 1999, pp. 407-410
To assess the influence of incubation conditions on the resistance of Helic
obacter pylori this study compared the effect of micro-aerophilic and anaer
obic incubation followed by micro-aerophilic incubation on the measurement
of metronidazole resistance of 102 H, pylori isolates, by both disk diffusi
on and Epsilometer (E)-tests, Anaerobic incubation for 24 h before micro-ae
rophilic incubation for 48 h consistently increased metronidazole activity
in both assay methods. Although statistically significant, this was microbi
ologically less significant, as only 4 of 102 isolates gave discrepant read
ings (all four were resistant in micro-aerophilic conditions but susceptibl
e in anaerobic/micro-aerophilic conditions), In all four cases variation wa
s by a few millimeters in zone size (i.e., all were close to the cut-off po
int). There was 100% agreement between disk diffusion and E-test results. O
f 104 observations (52 duplicate assays: 13 strains, two atmospheric condit
ions, two methods of determining resistance) there was 100% intra-observer
and inter-observer agreement with regard to susceptibility and resistance s
tatus for both E-test and disk diffusion methods, Anaerobic incubation foll
owed by micro-aerophilic incubation had little effect on the estimation of
prevalence of metronidazole resistance and seemed to add little, if any, si
gnificant advantage over micro-aerophilic incubation alone.