(-)Lobeline (1) and (-)nicotine (2) bind at neuronal nicotinic cholinergic
(nACh) receptors with high affinity (K-i = 4 and 2 nM, respectively). Previ
ous attempts to determine whether lobeline fits the currently accepted nico
tinic pharmacophore model have led to suggestions that the carbonyl functio
n, rather than the hydroxyl group, is a major contributor to binding. Inter
estingly, however, it has never been empirically demonstrated that either o
xygen function is actually required for interaction with the receptor. In t
he present investigation we systematically examined a number of abbreviated
analogues of lobeline and found that removal of either one or both oxygen
functions reduces the affinity of lobeline by at least 25-fold; furthermore
, oxidation of the (-)lobeline hydroxyl group (to afford lobelanine) or red
uction of the carbonyl group (to afford lobelanidine) also resulted in decr
eased affinity. Although it is likely that both oxygen functions contribute
to the high affinity of(-)lobeline at nACh receptors, it is concluded that
the presence of both oxygen functions is not a requirement for binding; th
at is, replacement of the (-)lobeline hydroxyl group with a chloro group ha
d no effect on affinity. Another finding of the present investigation is th
at removal of either one or both oxygen functions of lobeline results in co
mpounds that retain the analgesic activity and potency of (-)lobeline, indi
cating that there is no direct relationship between neuronal nicotinic chol
inergic (primarily alpha(4)beta(2) type) receptor affinity and spinal analg
esia as measured in the tail-flick assay.