Aluminum toxicity and high bulk density: Role in limiting shoot and root growth of selected aluminum indicator plants and eastern gamagrass in an acid soil
Cd. Foy et al., Aluminum toxicity and high bulk density: Role in limiting shoot and root growth of selected aluminum indicator plants and eastern gamagrass in an acid soil, J PLANT NUT, 22(10), 1999, pp. 1551-1566
Shallow rooting and susceptibility to drought are believed to be caused, at
least in part, by strongly acidic (pH <5.5, 1:1 soil-water), aluminum (Al)
-toxic subsoils. However, this hypothesis has not been clearly confirmed un
der field conditions. The Al toxicity hypothesis was tested on a map unit o
f Matawan-Hammonton loam (0-2% slope) on unlimed and limed field plots (pH
range 5.1 to 5.8) at Beltsville, MD, during 1994 to 1998. Aluminum-tolerant
and sensitive pairs of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), wheat [Triticum aestiv
um (L.)], snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), and soybean [Glycine max (L.)
Merr.] cultivars were used as indicator plants. Eastern gamagrass [Tripsacu
m dactyloides (L.) L.], cultivar 'Pete', reported to tolerate both chemical
and physical stress factors in soils, was grown for comparison. Shoots of
Al-sensitive 'Romano' snap beans showed a significant response to liming of
the 0-15 cm surface layer, but those of Al-tolerant 'Dade' did not, indica
ting that Al toxicity was a growth limiting factor in this acid soil at pH
5.1. Lime response of the Al-tolerant and sensitive cultivars of barley, wh
eat, and soybean were in the same direction but not significant at the 5% l
evel. Aluminum-tolerant and sensitive cultivars did not differ in abilities
to root in the 15-30 cm soil depth. Only 9 to 25% of total roots were in t
his layer, and 75 to 91% were in the 0-15 cm zone. No roots were found in t
he 30-45 cm zone which had a pH of 4.9. Soil bulk density values of 1.44 an
d 1.50 g cm(-3) in the 15-30 and 30-45 cm zones, respectively, indicated th
at mechanical impedance was a primary root barrier. Results indicated that
restricted shoot growth and shallow rooting of the Al-indicator plants stud
ied in this acid soil were due to a combination of Al toxicity and high soi
l bulk density. Confounding of the two factors may have masked the expected
response of indicator plants to Al. These two growth restricting factors l
ikely occur in many, if not most acid, problem subsoils. Studies are needed
to separate these factors and to develop plant genotypes that have toleran
ce to multiple abiotic stresses. Unlike the Al indicator cultivars, eastern
gamagrass showed high tolerance to acid, compact soils in the field and di
d not respond to lime applications (pH 5.1-5.8).