Surveyed opinion of American trauma surgeons on the prevention of the abdominal compartment syndrome

Citation
Jc. Mayberry et al., Surveyed opinion of American trauma surgeons on the prevention of the abdominal compartment syndrome, J TRAUMA, 47(3), 1999, pp. 509-513
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Volume
47
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
509 - 513
Database
ISI
SICI code
Abstract
Objective: To determine the current opinion of American trauma surgeons on the use of the open abdomen to prevent the abdominal compartment syndrome ( ACS). Methods: On a questionnaire survey of expert trauma surgeons regarding 12 c linical factors influencing fascial closure at trauma celiotomy, surgeons g raded their willingness to close the fascia in various scenarios on a scale of 1 to ts, The impact of six signs of clinical deterioration on willingne ss to perform abdominal decompression in a patient with postceliotomy eleva ted intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) was also queried, Of 292 members of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma active in abdominal trauma m anagement, 248 members (85%) had experience with ACS one or more times in t he previous gear. Results: Surgeons' responses to factors found at trauma celiotomy were divi ded into two distinct categories: factors decreasing willingness to close t he fascia, and factors not changing or increasing willingness to close the fascia (p < 0.001), Factors disfavoring fascial closure were pulmonary or h emodynamic deterioration with closure, massive bowel edema, subjectively ti ght closure, planned reoperation, and packing. Factors not changing or favo ring fascial closure were fecal contamination/peritonitis, massive transfus ion, hypothermia, multiple abdominal injuries, acidosis, and coagulopathy. Five of the six signs of clinical deterioration increased surgeons' willing ness to decompress a patient with elevated IAP (increased 0, requirement, d ecreased cardiac output, increased acidosis, increased airway pressures? an d oliguria), Lowered gastric mucosal pH did not affect willingness. Seventy -one percent of surgeons indicated they mould decompress elevated IAP in po stceliotomy patient if one or two signs of clinical deterioration were pres ent, but only 14% would decompress a patient for elevated IAP alone. Conclusion: A majority of expert American trauma surgeons have experience w ith ACS and would leave the abdomen open if ACS occurred. A majority would reopen a closed abdomen in cases of elevated WP with signs of clinical dete rioration. A minority would leave the abdomen open when there was only a ri sk of developing ACS.