Contrail forecasting techniques used within the UK Meteorological Office ha
ve changed little since the early 1940s and there has been no formal verifi
cation of the results. Recent research has shown that old forecasting techn
iques may not be wholly applicable to modern aircraft that now use more eff
icient engines. In order to compare the performance of both the old and new
forecasting techniques a validation trial was carried out over a nine-mont
h period in which RAF pilots reported when and where contrails did and did
not occur. These observations were compared with the predicted contrail lev
els from both the old and newer forecasting techniques. The results indicat
e that both techniques give a similar performance and that neither signific
antly out-perform a simple persistence prediction.