The ability to defer home country taxation of foreign income is widely crit
icized as encouraging excessive foreign investment. This criticism is based
on a model in which the function of deferral is to reallocate a fixed supp
ly of capital between foreign and domestic uses. In realistic situations, h
owever, deferral enhances the value to home countries of inframarginal fore
ign investment, taxation raises the value of marginal foreign investment, a
nd the trade-off between foreign and domestic investment need not be one-fo
r-one. Together, these considerations imply that deferring home taxation of
foreign income can enhance economic efficiency.