Inhibition of luciferase expression by synthetic hammerhead ribozymes and their cellular uptake

Citation
B. Bramlage et al., Inhibition of luciferase expression by synthetic hammerhead ribozymes and their cellular uptake, NUCL ACID R, 27(15), 1999, pp. 3159-3167
Citations number
48
Categorie Soggetti
Biochemistry & Biophysics
Journal title
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
ISSN journal
03051048 → ACNP
Volume
27
Issue
15
Year of publication
1999
Pages
3159 - 3167
Database
ISI
SICI code
0305-1048(19990801)27:15<3159:IOLEBS>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Two synthetic hammerhead ribozymes, one unmodified and the other with 2'-mo difications and four phosphorothioate groups, targeting a single GUA site i n the luciferase mRNA, were compared for their inhibition of gene expressio n in cell culture and their cellular uptake was also analysed. A HeLa X1/5 cell line stably expressing luciferase, under an inducible promoter, was tr eated with these ribozymes by liposome-mediated transfection to determine t heir activity. Luciferase expression in cells was inhibited to similar to 5 0% with little difference between the unmodified and the 2'-modified ribozy me, A similar degree of inhibition was observed with two catalytically inac tive ribozymes, indicating that inhibition was mainly due to an anti-sense effect, A ribozyme carrying a cholesterol moiety, applied to the cells with out carrier, showed no inhibition, Northern blotting indicated a similar am ount of cellular uptake of all ribozymes, The unmodified ribozyme was essen tially evenly distributed between cytoplasm and nucleus, whereas a higher p roportion of the phosphorothioate-containing ribozyme was observed in the n ucleus. Fluorescence microscopy, including confocal microscopy using 5'-flu orescein-labelled ribozymes, showed that the unmodified and 2'-modified rib ozymes were present in the cytoplasm and in the nucleus to a similar extent , whereas the fluorescence of the phosphorothioate-containing ribozyme was much stronger in the nucleus. Both ribozymes inhibited luciferase expressio n to a comparable degree, suggesting that the ribozyme in the nucleus did n ot contribute significantly to the inhibition. Ribozymes with a cholesterol moiety were predominantly trapped in the cell membrane, explaining their i nability to interfere with gene expression.