Designer testing: using subjects' personal vocabulary to produce individualised tests

Authors
Citation
Tm. Laidlaw, Designer testing: using subjects' personal vocabulary to produce individualised tests, PERS INDIV, 27(6), 1999, pp. 1197-1207
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology
Journal title
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES
ISSN journal
01918869 → ACNP
Volume
27
Issue
6
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1197 - 1207
Database
ISI
SICI code
0191-8869(199912)27:6<1197:DTUSPV>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
The principle of designer tests is that of using a subject's own semantics rather than lists of words that may or may not be relevant or even understa ndable for the subject. The Personalised Emotional Index (PEI) is a prototy pe designer test, in this case a mood test, that uses words that the subjec t chooses from a list of suggestions within mood categories. Each person's test is custom made from familiar and understandable words from his/her own vocabulary. Such a test has much face validity, can be succinct and has co mprehensibility for the subject. The results obtained when using this test at the same time as the Profile of Mood States Bipolar Version (POMS-BI) we re very similar (e.g. in a regression analysis, the 'elated-depressed' vari able predicted present overall mood on both tests (POMS: t = 5.25, p < 0.00 0, PEI: t = 5.84, p < 0.000) with a high correlation for total scores (r = 0.82, p < 0.000). The PEI results were correlated within the two week inter val (r's about -0.74; p < 0.000) and reasonably but not highly correlated o n retesting some months after the first testing (r's about -0.25; p < 0.000 ). It was successfully used to differentiate mood variables from a group co nsisting of caregivers of people with schizophrenia (n = 30, producing 399 days of data) and a group of unselected controls (n = 62, producing 1080 da ys of data). The lest appears to have validity, reliability, comparability, and utility. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.