Cl. Alados et al., Tolerance assessment of Cistus ladanifer to serpentine soils by developmental stability analysis, PLANT ECOL, 143(1), 1999, pp. 51-66
Developmental instability is the result of random environmental perturbatio
ns during development. Its absence (developmental stability) depends on an
organism's ability to buffer environmental disturbances. Both genotype and
environment influence the phenotypic expression of developmental instabilit
y and it is susceptible to selection pressure. We studied developmental ins
tability (as indicated by increased within-individual asymmetry of repeated
traits) in vegetative and reproductive structures of three populations of
Cistus ladanifer L. living in different soil substrates (serpentine, silice
ous and contact zone) to detect tolerance to serpentine soils. Serpentine s
oils, characterized by high concentrations of heavy metals (Ni, Cr, and Co)
, low levels of Ca/Mg ratio and high water deficit, can adversely affect pl
ant performance. In this study we demonstrated that asymmetry and within-pl
ant variance were higher in the contact zone population than either the sil
ica or serpentine populations, proving the adaptation of C. ladanifer to se
rpentine soils. Within-population estimates of developmental instability we
re concordant for both vegetative and reproductive traits. There was little
or no within-individual correlation among estimates of developmental insta
bility based on different structures, i.e., plants that had highly asymmetr
ic leaves always had high developmental instability in translational symmet
ry. Radial asymmetry of petals was negatively correlated with petal size, e
specially in silica soil plants, providing evidence of selection for symmet
ric and large petals. While leaf size was positively correlated with absolu
te fluctuating asymmetry, suggesting selection for small or intermediate si
ze leaves. Serpentine soils presented the largest foliar and floral traits,
as well as shoot elongation, while silica soil plants had the smallest sco
res. On the contrary, aboveground plant biomass was larger in silica soil p
lants, while the contact zone plants had the lowest biomass.