Comparability, validity, and impact of loss of information of a computerize
d adaptive administration of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventor
y-2 (MMPI-2) were assessed in a sample of 140 Veterans Affairs hospital pat
ients. The countdown method (Butcher, Keller, & Bacon, 1985) was used to ad
aptively administer Scales L (Lie) and F (Frequency), the 10 clinical scale
s, and the 15 content scales. Participants completed the MMPI-2 twice, in 1
of 2 conditions: computerized conventional test-retest, or computerized co
nventional-computerized adaptive. Mean profiles and test-retest correlation
s across modalities were comparable. Correlations between MMPI-2 scales and
criterion measures supported the validity of the countdown method, althoug
h some attenuation of validity was suggested for certain health-related ite
ms. Loss of information incurred with with this mode of adaptive resting ha
s minimal impact on test validity. Item and time savings were substantial.