Rm. Burgess et al., DEVELOPMENT OF A CATION-EXCHANGE METHODOLOGY FOR MARINE TOXICITY IDENTIFICATION EVALUATION APPLICATIONS, Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 16(6), 1997, pp. 1203-1211
In phase I of a standard toxicity identification evaluation (TIE) six
manipulations are used to characterize toxicity. The ethylenediaminete
traacetic acid addition manipulation is most often used to indicate to
xicity caused by divalent metals. An alternative approach for characte
rizing/identifying metal toxicity is the use of cation-exchange chroma
tography. In this study, five cation-exchange media were compared to d
evelop a method for using cation-exchange chromatography as part of a
marine TIE. To be considered useful the cation-exchange media must mee
t the following criteria: (1) consistently (with minimal variability)
extract and elute toxic concentrations of a mixture of metals spiked i
nto seawater, (2) demonstrate negligible blank acute toxicity, and (3)
function effectively with environmental samples. Two solid-phase extr
action media met the criteria: Supelco's LC-WCX column and Alltech's E
xtract-Clean IC-Chelate column. In general, these columns were able to
remove 80 to 100% of five metals (Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb, Zn) from spiked sea
water, and 85 to 100% of metals could be eluted back into solution (ex
cept copper for which recovery was 65-75%). Columns functioned effecti
vely with seawater spiked with metals concentrations approaching 600 m
u g/L and showed low intercolumn variability (coefficient of variation
= 1.0-14%). For actual environmental samples, once column breakthroug
h was assessed, both columns reduced toxicity and metal concentrations
in postcolumn samples. Further, reconstituted column eluates were as
toxic as whole samples. The methodology described can be used to assis
t in the TIE characterization and identification of toxic metals in en
vironmental samples.