Re. Goudey et Sc. Thompson, EVALUATION OF INFECTION-CONTROL IN REGISTERED TATTOOING PREMISES IN VICTORIA, 1994, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health, 21(1), 1997, pp. 22-28
Tattooists at a random sample of registered tattooing premises were su
rveyed for self-reported compliance with infection-control practices s
pecified in the Victorian Standards of practice for tattooing, and som
e were observed while tattooing, Of 35 respondents, 94 per cent report
ed that they believed their practice fully met the standards, yet 19 p
er cent of tattooists did not have a copy of the standards at their pr
emises. Most believed the standards could be improved. There was consi
derable discrepancy between reported practice and that observed. Few t
attooists understood or implemented universal precautions, and while m
ost wore gloves, there was low level of use of eye and clothing protec
tion. Tattooists touched many surfaces that had not been cleaned or di
sinfected between clients. Ultrasonic cleaners were generally operated
without lids. Because of this, they were a danger both to operators a
nd their clients. At no premises was equipment used that had been both
cleaned according to the standards and sterilised in an autoclave tha
t had passed a sterilisation test. The situation in Victoria is simila
r to that identified in other states. There is an urgent need for trai
ning of tattooists and the environmental health officers who supervise
them.