Mj. Thornton et al., A three-dimensional gadolinium enhanced MR venography technique for imaging central veins, AM J ROENTG, 173(4), 1999, pp. 999-1003
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
OBJECTIVE. We evaluated the use of a three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced
MR venography technique in selected patients with suspected central venous
abnormalities.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Thirty-seven patients with suspected thrombosis, sten
osis, occlusion, or compression of the axillary vein, subclavian vein, brac
hiocephalic vein, or superior or inferior vena cava or with suspected malfu
nction of central venous catheters were imaged. For all patients, we obtain
ed a three-dimensional dynamic gadolinium-enhanced (bolus injection, 30-40
mi) breath-hold spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition in the steady state a
s well. as conventional venous images from either Doppler sonography, CT, o
r digital subtraction venography. Breath-hold fast multiplanar spoiled grad
ient-recalled acquisitions in the steady state were obtained using the foll
owing parameters: TR/TE, 10.3/1.9; flip angle, 45 degrees; matrix size, 256
x 128; number of excitations, one; field of view, 36-48 cm; number of part
itions, 28; and slice thickness, 2.5-4 mm. MR venograms and conventional im
ages were interpreted by two observers in consensus who were unaware of cli
nical information and the diagnosis.
RESULTS. MR venograms were of diagnostic quality for all 37 patients. Thirt
een patients had normal venous systems seen on both conventional and MR ima
ges. MR venography showed all nine venous stenoses, the one pericatheter fi
brin sheath, and the one jugular vein thrombosis. Axillary or subclavian ve
in thrombosis was correctly diagnosed with MR venography in all four patien
ts with this condition. Mediastinal venous compression was accurately depic
ted by MR venography in the five patients who had such compression. Finally
, MR venography revealed the correct diagnosis in the three patients with i
nferior vena cava thrombus and tumor and the one patient with inferior vena
cava compression. Thus, MR venography was 100% sensitive, specific, and ac
curate in the diagnosis of abnormalities affecting large central veins.
CONCLUSION. Compared with conventional imaging, gadolinium-enhanced breath-
hold MR venography is easy to perform, well tolerated, and highly accurate
in depicting central venous abnormalities.