Background. Computed tomography is used in our hospital to diagnose complic
ations after median sternotomy, but its efficiency is unknown. Nor is the c
omputed tomographic appearance of normal healing of a median sternotomy kno
wn. Computed tomography was evaluated for its ability to diagnose mediastin
itis and sternal dehiscence, and a reference material of normally healing m
edian sternotomies was created.
Methods. In a prospective study, 20 patients with a normally healing median
sternotomy were examined 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after ope
ration. In a retrospective study, 87 scans from 65 patients that were made
because a postoperative complication was suspected were reviewed.
Results. In the prospective study, all patients had clinically uneventful h
ealing. None of the computed tomographic scans showed radiologic signs of h
ealing at 3 months. At 6 months, half of the patients had healed completely
. In the retrospective study, 49 scans were performed on suspicion of infec
tion; 7 of them indicated mediastinitis, 2 were false-positive, while media
stinitis was present in a total of 16 of the scans. Thirty-eight scans were
made because of sternal pain or suspected dehiscence; after 21 of the scan
s, recovery was uneventful, and in 11, the definite diagnosis was dehiscenc
e or pseudarthrosis.
Conclusions. Clinical healing of the sternotomy does not correlate with the
computed tomographic image. Computed tomography is not a sensitive tool fo
r diagnosing mediastinitis, and in patients with sternal pain, it adds litt
le information. (Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:858-63) (C) 1999 by The Society of
Thoracic Surgeons.