Comparison of intratracheal pulmonary ventilation with hybrid intratracheal pulmonary ventilation in a rabbit model of acute respiratory distress syndrome by saline lavage
Ca. Perez et al., Comparison of intratracheal pulmonary ventilation with hybrid intratracheal pulmonary ventilation in a rabbit model of acute respiratory distress syndrome by saline lavage, ASAIO J, 45(5), 1999, pp. 496-501
We compared different hybrid mode ITPV (h-ITPV) flow rates, and h-ITPV with
intratracheal pulmonary ventilation (ITPV) with respect to CO2 clearance a
nd oxygenation. Surfactant deficiency was induced in six adult rabbits with
saline lavage. The study consisted of three phases. Phase 0: Stabilization
on conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV). Phase I: Bias flow initiated
at same pressure and respiratory rate as Phase 0. Flow rates of 25%, 50%,
75% h-ITPV, and ITPV were initiated. Animals were transitioned from CMV to
25% h-ITPV proceeding sequentially to ITPV or vice versa. Phase II: Animals
were returned to CMV. Statistical analysis included the two-way analysis o
f variance (ANOVA) and repeated measures ANOVA with Tuckey's test. No diffe
rence in PaCO2 was observed among all h-ITPV flow rates or between h-ITPV a
nd ITPV. After bias flow was introduced (transition from Phase 0 to Phase I
), PaCO2 decreased by 37%. PaCO2 increased by 119% during Phase II. Oxygena
tion improved in all animals, particularly in those transitioned to 25% h-I
TPV and proceeding to ITPV. No difference in CO2 clearance between ITPV and
h-ITPV was observed. Even at law bias flows, excellent CO2 clearance was a
chieved. Oxygenation was superior when animals were transitioned from CMV t
o h-ITPV. Hybrid-ITPV offers some advantages over ITPV and may represent a
powerful tool in the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARD
S).