Analysis of the effects of growth hormone, voluntary exercise, and food restriction on diaphyseal bone in female F344 rats

Citation
Mj. Banu et al., Analysis of the effects of growth hormone, voluntary exercise, and food restriction on diaphyseal bone in female F344 rats, BONE, 25(4), 1999, pp. 469-480
Citations number
48
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology, Metabolism & Nutrition","da verificare
Journal title
BONE
ISSN journal
87563282 → ACNP
Volume
25
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
469 - 480
Database
ISI
SICI code
8756-3282(199910)25:4<469:AOTEOG>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
The aim of this study is to examine the effects of growth hormone, exercise , and weight loss due to food restriction on tibial diaphyseal bone and on tibial muscle mass. Thirteen-month-old female F344 rats were divided into s ix groups: group 1, baseline controls (B); group 2, age-matched controls (C ); group 3, GH treated (GH); group 4, voluntary wheel running exercise (EX) ; group 5, GH + EX; and group 6, food restricted (FR). The dose of GH was 2 .5 mg recombinant human (rh) GH/kg body weight/day, 5 days per week, given in two divided doses of 1.25 mg at 9-10 A.M. and 4-5 P.M. Food-restricted r ats were fed 60% of the mean food intake of the age-matched controls. All a nimals except the baseline controls were killed after 4.5 months. The basel ine controls were killed at the beginning of the study. Growth hormone incr eased the body weight and tibial muscle mass of the rats markedly, while EX caused only a slight decrease in body weight and partially inhibited the i ncrease caused by GH in the GH + EX group. Food restriction greatly decreas ed body weight below that of age-matched controls, but neither FR nor EX ha d a significant effect on the mass of the muscles around the tibia. Growth hormone and EX independently increased tibial diaphyseal cortical bone area (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001), cortical thickness (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001), cor tical bone mineral content (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001), periosteal perimeter ( p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001), and bone strength-strain index (SSI) (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001), The effects of GH were more marked and resulted in a greater i ncrease in the weight of the mid tibial diaphysis (p < 0.0001). The combina tion of GH and EX produced additive effects on many of the tibial diaphysea l parameters, including bone SSI. GH + EX, but not GH or EX alone, caused a significant increase in endocortical perimeter (p < 0.0001). In the FR rat s, cortical bone area and cortical mineral content increased above the base line level (p < 0.0001,p < 0.0001) but were below the levels for age-matche d controls (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001). In addition, marrow area, endocortical perimeter, and endocortical bone formation rate increased significantly in the FR rats (p < 0.01, p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001). Three-point bending test o f right tibial diaphysis resulted in maximum force (Fmax) values that refle cted the group differences in indices of tibial diaphyseal bone mass, excep t that GH + EX did not produce additive effect on Fmax. The latter showed g ood correlation with left tibial diaphyseal SSI (r = 0.857, p < 0.0001), an d both indices of bone strength correlated well with tibial muscle mass (r = 0.771, Fmax; r 0.700, SSI; p < 0.0001). GH increased serum IGF-I (p < 0.0 001), and the increase was partially reduced by EX. Serum osteocalcin was i ncreased by GH with or without EX (p < 0.01, p < 0.01), and FR or EX alone did not alter serum IGF-I and osteocalcin levels. The bone anabolic effects of GH with or without EX may relate, in part, to increased load on bone fr om tibial muscles and body weight, which were increased by the hormone. The osteogenic effect of EX with or without GH may relate, in part, to increas ed frequency of muscle load on bone as EX decreased body weight (p < 0.05), but had no significant effect on tibial muscle mass. The enhanced loss of endocortical bone by FR may relate, in part, to decreased load on bone due to low body weight (p < 0.0001), as FR did not cause a significant decrease in tibial muscle mass (p = 0.357). The roles of humoral and local factors in the bone changes observed remain to be established. (C) 1999 by Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.