D. Shutler et al., Mass dynamics of the spleen and other organs in geese: measures of immune relationships to helminths?, CAN J ZOOL, 77(3), 1999, pp. 351-359
Citations number
75
Categorie Soggetti
Animal Sciences
Journal title
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE ZOOLOGIE
The spleen is an important organ of avian immune systems. We examined wheth
er helminth loads were related to spleen mass in the lesser snow goose, Che
n caerulescens caerulescens. On 27 collecting occasions, 744 geese were obt
ained at 13 different locations in a south-north gradient in midcontinental
North America. The masses of the spleen, caecum, small intestine, large in
testine, pancreas, heart, and crop of all geese were determined, and intest
inal and caecal helminths were counted. Seventy-eight percent of geese harb
ored at least one helminth species. For analyses, helminths were grouped as
cestodes (26% prevalence), trematodes (19% prevalence), and nematodes (70%
prevalence). After sample location and time, host age, host sex, and host
body size were controlled for in a multivariate analysis of covariance, nem
atodes were the only helminth group associated with variation in organ mass
es. Greater nematode loads were weakly associated with lower spleen, higher
caecum, lower large intestine, and lower heart masses. When uninfected ind
ividuals were excluded from the analysis, seater nematode loads were no lon
ger associated with variation in spleen size but were associated with highe
r crop mass, and greater cestode loads were associated with higher heart ma
ss. In neither of these analyses were any other cestode-organ or trematode-
organ associations significant. Geese carrying two or more helminth groups
had lower spleen masses than did geese infected with no or one helminth gro
up. When we interchanged response and explanatory variables from the preced
ing analyses and retained the same covariates, the same organ mass - helmin
th associations tended to remain significant. Nonetheless, the small variat
ion in helminth loads explained by variation in spleen mass (or vice versa)
provided only weak support for the hypothesis that intraspecifically, wild
individuals with lower investment in immunity are more susceptible to nema
tode infections.