Objective: To examine existing asbestos-exposed occupational cohorts and ap
ply a meta-analytic technique to determine the magnitude of association bet
ween exposure and lung cancer and to investigate other cancer sites that ma
y be related to such an exposure.
Methods: We summarized the data from 69 asbestos-exposed occupational cohor
ts reporting on cancer morbidity and mortality. Data were extracted regardi
ng numbers of deaths for each cancer, numbers of mesotheliomas, occupations
and latency for respiratory, gastrointestinal, urinary and lymphohematopoi
etic cancers. For each cancer, we calculated a meta-SMR and examined hetero
geneity of results using a chi-square test and by calculating a Z-statistic
for each study. To examine the dose-response effect, we divided the studie
s into tertiles according to the percentage of mesothelioma deaths that ser
ved as a proxy estimation of asbestos exposure.
Results: Lung cancer data demonstrated meta-SMRs of 163 and 148 with and wi
thout latency, respectively, with significant heterogeneity of results even
after stratification according to occupational groups. Stratification of l
ung cancer studies according to percentage of mesothelioma deaths showed a
dose-response effect. Z-scores ranged from - 12.21 to + 29.49. Analysis for
laryngeal cancer yielded meta-SMRs of 157 and 133 with and without latency
, respectively, demonstrating homogeneous results across studies but accomp
anied by no evidence of a dose-response effect. Data for gastrointestinal c
ancers showed no evidence of a significant association and no dose-response
effect. Kidney cancer demonstrated statistically non-significant meta-SMRs
of 120 (95% CI 88-160) and 111 (95% CI 94-131) with and without latency re
spectively.
Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrates a wide variability of the asso
ciation between occupational asbestos and lung cancer. There was a suggesti
on of an association between asbestos and laryngeal carcinoma and no clear
association with other cancers.