Management of failing prosthetic bypass grafts with metallic stent placement

Citation
Gp. Siskin et al., Management of failing prosthetic bypass grafts with metallic stent placement, CARDIO IN R, 22(5), 1999, pp. 375-380
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging
Journal title
CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY
ISSN journal
01741551 → ACNP
Volume
22
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
375 - 380
Database
ISI
SICI code
0174-1551(199909/10)22:5<375:MOFPBG>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the role of metallic stents in treating stenoses invol ving prosthetic arterial bypass grafts. Methods: Patients undergoing stent placement within a failing prosthetic by pass graft, during a 41-month period, were reviewed for treatment outcome a nd complications. The indications for stent placement in 15 patients includ ed severe claudication (n = 3), rest pain (n = 9), and minor or major tissu e loss (n = 3). Lesions were at the proximal anastomosis (n = 6), the dista l anastomosis (n = 3), or within the graft (n = 6) Results. Treatment with metallic stents was successful in all patients. The re was one acute stent thrombosis, successfully treated with thrombolytic t herapy. Follow-up data are available for a mean duration of 12.3 months. Th e mean duration of primary patency was 9.4 months with 6- and 12-month prim ary patency rates of 51.9% and 37.0%, respectively. The mean duration of se condary patency was 12.1 months with 6- and 12-month secondary patency rate s of 80.0% and 72.7%, respectively. Two patients with discontinuous runoff and preexisting gangrene required a below-knee amputation. Six patients wer e revised surgically after stent placement (at a mean of 10.8 months). Thre e late deaths occurred during follow-up. Conclusion: Given the mortality risks of surgical revision and the reduced life expectancy of this patient population, metallic stent placement repres ents a viable, short-term treatment option for stenoses within or at the an astomoses of prosthetic grafts. Further evaluation is warranted to compare intragraft stent placement with surgical graft revision.