Quantification of horseradish peroxidase delivery into the arterial wall in vivo as a model of local drug treatment: Comparison between a porous and a gel-coated balloon catheter

Purpose: To quantify horseradish peroxidase (HRP) delivery into the arteria l wall, as a model of local drug delivery, and to compare two different per cutaneous delivery balloons. Methods: Perforated and hydrophilic hydrogel-coated balloon catheters were used to deliver HRP in aqueous solution into the wall of porcine iliac arte ries in vivo. HRP solutions of 1 mg/ml were used together with both perfora ted and hydrophilic hydrogel-coated balloon catheters and 40 mg/ml HRP solu tions were used with the hydrogel-coated balloon only. The amount of HRP de posited in the arterial wall was then determined photo spectrometrically. Results: Using the 1 mg/ml HRP solution, the hydrogelcoated balloon absorbe d 0.047 mg HRP into the coating. Treatment with this balloon resulted in a mean vessel wall concentration of 7.4 mu g HRP/g tissue +/- 93% (standard d eviation) (n = 7). Treatment with the hydrogel-coated balloon that had abso rbed 1.88 mg HRP into the coating (using the 40 mg/ml HRP solution) led to a mean vessel wall concentration of 69.5 mu g HRP/g tissue +/- 74% (n = 7). Treatment with the perforated balloon using 1 mg/ml aqueous HRP solution l ed to a mean vessel wall concentration of 174 mu g/g +/- 81% (n = 7). Diffe rences between the hydrogel-coated and perforated balloons (I mg/g solution s of HRP) and between hydrogel-coated balloons (0.047 mg vs 1.88 mg absorbe d into the balloon coating) were significant (p < 0.05; two-sided Wilcoxon test). Conclusions: The use of a perforated balloon catheter allowed the delivery of a higher total amount of HRP compared with the hydrogel-coated balloon, but at the cost of a higher systemic HRP application. To deliver 174 mu g H RP per gram of vessel wall with the perforated balloon, 6.5 +/- 1.5 mg HRP were lost into the arterial blood (delivery efficiency range = 0.2%-0.3%). With 0.047 mg HRP loaded into the coating of the hydrogel balloon, 7.4 mu g HRP could be applied to 1 g of vessel wall (delivery efficiency 1.7%), and with 1.88 mg HRP loaded into the coating of the hydrogel balloon, 69.5 mu g HRP could be applied per gram of vessel wall (delivery efficiency 0.6%).