Objective-To assess whether the Ottawa ankle rules can be used to accuratel
y predict which children with ankle and midfoot injuries need radiography.
Methods-Prospective study with historical control group of all children age
d 1-15 years presenting to Sheffield Children's Hospital accident and emerg
ency department with blunt ankle and/or midfoot injuries during two five mo
nth periods before and after implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules.
Results-In the study group 432 out of 761 (56.76%) patients received radiog
raphy compared with 500 out of 782 (63.93%) in the control group. This was
a statistically significant reduction in radiography rate of 7.2% (95% conf
idence interval 2.3% to 12.1%, p < 0.01). The sensitivity of the Ottawa ank
le rules was 98.3% and the specificity 46.9%. There was no increase in the
number of missed fractures (one in each group).
Conclusion-The Ottawa ankle rules can be applied in children to determine t
he need for radiography in ankle and midfoot injuries. Their implementation
leads to a reduction in the radiography rate without leading to an increas
e in the number of missed fractures.