International comparisons of dairy sires for production, type, health, and
management traits often rely on regression-based conversion equations. Conv
ersion equations are generally calculated using least squares regression, a
procedure that is highly susceptible to outlier data points. Outliers can
correspond to sires with unusually high or low estimated breeding values in
the importing country, but they can also result from errors (e.g., in data
collection or data entry) or biases (e.g., from preferential treatment) in
the data. Because conversion equations are often calculated using data fro
m a small number of sires, a single outlier can have a large influence on t
he resulting regression equation. Robust regression procedures can provide
protection against outliers and high leverage points by decreasing the weig
ht given to specific data values that are in disagreement with the majority
of the sample. In this study, robust regression techniques were used to de
velop conversion equations for production, type, and health traits with dat
a from the US, Great Britain, Italy, and South Africa. Relative accuracy of
the least squares and robust estimators was measured as the standard devia
tion of converted breeding values across repeated samples of the data; this
measure was of the ability of each method to provide consistent estimates
in small data sets that might or might not have contained outliers. Perform
ance of the least median squares and least trimmed squares estimators was c
onsistently poorer than least squares. Conversions calculated using M-type
estimators were similar to conversions calculated using least squares, perh
aps because of a lack of gross errors in the data. Based on this study, it
appeared that robust regression estimators did not provide a significant in
crease in accuracy of international conversion equations relative to least
squares regression.