Follow-up visits after IUD insertion - Are more better?

Citation
D. Hubacher et J. Fortney, Follow-up visits after IUD insertion - Are more better?, J REPRO MED, 44(9), 1999, pp. 801-806
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine
Journal title
JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE
ISSN journal
00247758 → ACNP
Volume
44
Issue
9
Year of publication
1999
Pages
801 - 806
Database
ISI
SICI code
0024-7758(199909)44:9<801:FVAII->2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether frequent follow-up visits for intrauterine device (IUD) users prevents the development of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, cohort design was used to study 1,713 women wh o received an IUD in 1992 in Mexico. They were divided into two different f ollow-up regimens and were asked to return for either two or four revisits in the first year after insertion. The main outcome measures included incid ence of PID and asymptomatic/symptomatic lower genital tract infections. Ti me to detection of lower genital tract infections wits measured in a propor tional hazards regression model; this analysis achieved 90% power to detect differences between the regimens. RESULTS: The two regimens were nearly identical in terms of PID incidence. The incidence rates for asymptomatic and symptomatic lower genital tract in fection were slightly higher in the four-visit regimen; however, the incide nce rate ratios were not statistically elevated: 1.41 (0.77-2.56) and 1.23 (0.67-2.27), respectively. In the regression, the variable denoting follow- up regimen was not associated with time to detection of lower genital CONCLUSION: More follow-up visits for IUD users provide no benefit in terms of preventing PID or progression toward the disease.