Ld. Galuppo et al., Evaluation of iodophor skin preparation techniques and factors influencingdrainage from ventral midline incisions in horses, J AM VET ME, 215(7), 1999, pp. 963-969
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Veterinary Medicine/Animal Health
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
Objective-To document natural bacterial flora on the ventral aspect of the
equine abdomen, to compare 2 preparation techniques, and to identify potent
ial risk factors that may contribute to incisional drainage.
Design-Prospective study.
Animals-53 horses undergoing exploratory celiotomy.
Procedure-Group-1 horses (n = 26) were prepared with povidone-iodine and al
cohol. Group-2 horses (27) were prepared with a film-forming iodophor compl
ex. Numbers of bacterial colony-forming units (CFU) were measured before an
d after surgical scrub, following skin closure, and after recovery from gen
eral anesthesia. Swab specimens to identify normal skin bacterial flora and
potential pathogens were obtained by swabbing a 4 x 4-cm area. Variables t
hat might affect incisional drainage were also investigated.
Results-For both techniques, there was a significant reduction in bacterial
numbers after skin preparation. Incisional drainage was observed in 14 (26
%) horses (8 group-1 and 6 group-2 horses). Preexisting dermatitis, poor in
traoperative drape adherence, high number of bacterial CFU obtained after r
ecovery from anesthesia, and high number of CFU obtained from the surgery r
oom environment were the main risk factors associated with subsequent incis
ional drainage. Bacillus sop, nonhemolytic Staphylococcus spp, Micrococcus
sop, Corynebacterium spp, Streptomyces spp, other nonenteric genera, and no
n-hemolytic Streptococcus spp were the most common isolates obtained before
surgical scrub.
Conclusions and Clinical Relevance-Both skin preparation techniques were eq
ually effective in reducing numbers of bacterial CFU by 99%, and a signific
ant difference was not found in incisional drainage rate between groups. Pr
otection of the wound during recovery from anesthesia and the immediate pos
toperative period may reduce incisional drainage after abdominal surgery in
horses.