Re. Phinney et Rm. Siegel, Stored representations of three-dimensional objects in the absence of two-dimensional cues, PERCEPTION, 28(6), 1999, pp. 725-737
Object recognition was studied in human subjects to determine whether the s
torage of the visual objects was in a two-dimensional or a three-dimensiona
l representation. Novel motion-based and disparity-based stimuli were gener
ated in which three-dimensional and two-dimensional form cues could be mani
pulated independently. Subjects were required to generate internal represen
tations from motion stimuli that lacked explicit two-dimensional cues. Thes
e stored internal representations were then matched against internal three-
dimensional representations constructed from disparity stimuli. These new s
timuli were used to confirm prior studies that indicated the primacy of two
-dimensional cues for view-based object storage. However, under tightly con
trolled conditions for which only three-dimensional cues were available, hu
man subjects were also able to match an internal representation derived fro
m motion to that of disparity. This last finding suggests that there is an
internal storage of an object's representations in three dimensions, a tene
t that has been rejected by view-based theories. Thus, any complete theory
of object recognition that is based on primate vision must incorporate thre
e-dimensional stored representations.