Subchronic/chronic toxicity studies on antimony potassium tartrate (APT) ha
ve been reviewed. One of the older studies (H. A. Schroeder ct al., 1970, J
. Nutr. 100 (1), 59-68), on which are based the EPA reference dose value an
d a number of state, national, and international drinking water criteria fo
r antimony, has severe inadequacies in study conduct making it uninterpreta
ble and inappropriate for characterization of APT toxicity. In particular,
the manner in which control data were generated and utilized in this study
is considered invalid. More recent drinking water studies conducted by the
NTP (1992,"NTP Technical Report on Toxicity Studies of Antimony Potassium T
artrate in F344/N Rats and B6C3F(1) Mice (Drinking Water and Intraperitonea
l Injection Studies)," NTP Toxicity Report Series, No. II) and Poon ct al.
(1998, Food Chem. Toxicol 36, 20-35) showed antimony to be of low toxicity.
The NOAEL in the 14-day NTP study was 2500 ppm by the oral route in both r
ats and mice, while Poon ct at (1998) suggested a NOAEL of 0.5 ppm in their
90-day study. However, upon close examination, it was determined that this
value was based on subtle histological changes in the thyroid gland that w
ere physiological, not toxicological, in nature. This conclusion is support
ed further by an absence of these changes in a well-conducted 13-week intra
peritoneal exposure study in rats that utilized APT at much higher doses (N
TP, 1992). Thus, the NOAEL by Poon ct al. (1998) should more appropriately
be 50 ppm. When regulatory criteria for antimony are established and/or rev
iewed, the findings in the NTP study and this critical reevaluation of the
Poon ct at (1998) study should be considered when establishing a NOAEL for
subchronic exposure to antimony in the future. (C) 1999 Academic Press.