This article presents and juxtaposes critical genealogies of develpment stu
dies and postcolonial studies, two bodies of liberature on the 'Third World
' that ignore each other's missions and writings. I demonstrate that the tw
o fields have some areas of convergence, such as groundings in knowledge of
and concern about the West, and other areas of divergence: development stu
dies does not tend to listen to subalterns and postcolonial studies does no
t tend to concern itself,vith whether the subaltern is eating. I argue that
, of the two fields, postcolonial studies has the greatest potential to be
a new and different location of human development thinking if it can overco
me a tendency to lock into intellectual rather than practical projects of p
ostcolonialism.