We describe the first test conducted to determine user consistency in the a
pplication of hydrogeomorphic (HGM) functional assessment models. Over a th
ree-week period, two teams of individuals trained in the HGM methodology as
sessed 44 riverine wetlands on the Coastal Plain of Delaware, Maryland, and
Virginia, USA. Results demonstrated a high degree of agreement between the
two assessment teams for both Variable Subindices and Functional Capacity
Index Scores, indicating that the assessment models were robust and results
were repeatable. Analyses of the data demonstrated the importance of only
using variables whose measurements are repeatable. When variable measuremen
ts are not repeatable, HGM functional capacity scores are detrimentally aff
ected, especially functions that are modeled by only a few variables.