This paper examines how a producer's status in the market influences its ch
oices about product quality, and the outcomes that result. We compare econo
mic models of reputation that emphasize the role of past quality as a sourc
e of information about current quality with sociological models of status t
hat emphasize the role of affiliations. We test hypotheses about the comple
mentary effects of status and reputation in an analysis of more than 10,000
affiliation decisions made by 595 wineries over a 10-year period. Results
show that actors occupying high-status positions obtain greater benefit fro
m subsequent high-status affiliations than do actors occupying low-status p
ositions. As such, these actors are more willing and able to pay for subseq
uent high-status affiliations and to use them to advance their position in
the larger status ordering.