HIV viral load and response to antileishmanial chemotherapy in co-infectedpatients

Citation
N. Berhe et al., HIV viral load and response to antileishmanial chemotherapy in co-infectedpatients, AIDS, 13(14), 1999, pp. 1921-1925
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Immunology
Journal title
AIDS
ISSN journal
02699370 → ACNP
Volume
13
Issue
14
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1921 - 1925
Database
ISI
SICI code
0269-9370(19991001)13:14<1921:HVLART>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
Objective: To investigate whether clearance of Leishmania parasites from ti ssue aspirate smears in patients with HIV and visceral leishmaniasis (VL) c o-infection treated with pentavalent antimonials is influenced by initial H IV viral load and to assess the effect of active VL on HIV viral load and r eplication in vivo. Methods: Leishmania parasites were identified in Giemsa-stained smears prep ared from tissue aspirates. Parasite index was determined by quantifying Le ishmania donovani bodies in smears. HIV-1 RNA was quantitated by using the nucleic acid sequence-based amplification technique with a limit of detecti on of 500 copies/ml. All patients were treated with pentavalent antimonials at 20 mg pentavalent antimony (Sb-V)/kg daily for a total of 28 days. None of the patients received specific anti-retroviral therapy. Results: Seventeen patients (73.9%) showed good initial response to antilei shmanial treatment and the remaining six (26.1%) had very poor response. Am ong the good responders, 11 (64.7%) had no demonstrable Leishmania donovani bodies in post-therapy tissue aspirate smear preparations, and in the rema ining six (35.3%) their parasite loads were reduced to very low levels. Pat ients with poor response had persistently high parasite index despite compl etion of anti-leishmanial chemotherapy. Poor responders had pre-treatment m edian HIV viral load that was > 160-fold higher than responders to anti-lei shmanial chemotherapy; [410 000 copies/ml (quartile range, 33 000 - 530 000 ) and 2500 copies/ml (quartile range 500 - 297 500), respectively]. Further more, compared with pre-treatment viral concentrations, patients with good response showed marked reduction in post- treatment viral load. In contrast , post-treatment HIV viral concentrations were markedly increased among pat ients with poor response to anti-leishmanial therapy. Conclusions: The results suggest that pre-treatment HIV viral load influenc es response to anti-leishmanial chemotherapy and active VL is associated wi th increased viral replication in vivo, supporting the notion that dual inf ection plays an important role in the pathogenesis and disease progression of either infection. (C) 1999 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.