Empirical research on the permanent-income hypothesis (PIH) has found that
consumption growth is excessively sensitive to predictable changes in incom
e. This finding is interpreted as strong evidence against the PIH. We propo
se an explanation for apparent excess sensitivity that is based an a quanti
tative equilibrium model of household production in which permanent-income
consumers respond to shifts in sectoral wages and prices by substituting wo
rk effort and consumption across home and market sectors. Although the PIH
is true this mechanism generates apparent excess sensitivity because market
consumption responds to predictable income growth. (JEL D13, E10, E21).