Validation of a self-administered food-frequency questionnaire administered in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) Study: comparison of energy, protein, and macronutuient intakes estimatedwith the doubly labeled water, urinary nitrogen, and repeated 24-h dietaryrecall methods
A. Kroke et al., Validation of a self-administered food-frequency questionnaire administered in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) Study: comparison of energy, protein, and macronutuient intakes estimatedwith the doubly labeled water, urinary nitrogen, and repeated 24-h dietaryrecall methods, AM J CLIN N, 70(4), 1999, pp. 439-447
Background: The validation of dietary assessment instruments is critical in
the evaluation of diet as a chronic disease risk factor.
Objective: The objective was to assess the validity of a self-administered
food-frequency questionnaire by comparison with dietary recall, urinary nit
rogen excretion, and total energy expenditure data.
Design: Over a 1-y period, data from twelve 24-h dietary recalls, a food-fr
equency questionnaire, and four 24-h urine samples were obtained from 134 s
tudy participants of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and
Nutrition (EPIC) Study in Potsdam, Germany. In a substudy of 28 participan
ts, total energy expenditure from doubly labeled water measurements was ass
essed.
Results: Energy-adjusted, deattenuated correlation coefficients between the
questionnaire and the recalls ranged from 0.54 for dietary fiber to 0.86 f
or alcohol. Cross-classification of quintiles of nutrient intakes from the
questionnaire and recalls indicated severe misclassification to be <4%. Rep
orted protein intake correlated with estimated protein excretion (r = 0.46)
. Energy intake and total energy expenditure were also significantly correl
ated (r = 0.48); however, all but one subject underreported their energy in
take. The magnitude of underreporting varied considerably, by 22% on averag
e, and increased slightly with increasing energy intake. A similar pattern
of underreporting was observed when energy intakes from the 24-h dietary re
calls were compared with total energy expenditure.
Conclusions: These data indicate an acceptable relative validity of the foo
d-frequency questionnaire in this study population. Compared with measureme
nts of total energy expenditure and protein excretion, however, only modera
te agreement with both the food-frequency questionnaire and the 24-h dietar
y recalls was observed.