Comparison of rated and ranked health and lifestyle values

Citation
Mf. Johnson et al., Comparison of rated and ranked health and lifestyle values, AM J HEAL B, 23(5), 1999, pp. 356-367
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH BEHAVIOR
ISSN journal
10873244 → ACNP
Volume
23
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
356 - 367
Database
ISI
SICI code
1087-3244(199909/10)23:5<356:CORARH>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
Objective: Values are typically ranked; however, ratings have desirable adm inistrative and statistical properties. The purpose of the present study wa s to determine the better format to measure health and lifestyle values: tr aditional ranking or Likert-type rating. Methods: Psychometric properties o f the two survey formats were compared on a sample of 183 first-year univer sity students. Results: The ranking format had higher one-week test-retest reliabilities than did ratings (median .66 vs .60) but consistently lower v alidities when compared to self-report health behaviors. Conclusion: Result s: from the present study suggest that a rating format for health and lifes tyle value items should be used.