Jf. Antognini et al., Quantitative and qualitative effects of isoflurane on movement occurring after noxious stimulation, ANESTHESIOL, 91(4), 1999, pp. 1064-1071
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Background Anesthetic potency is assessed by determination of the anestheti
c concentration that prevents gross, purposeful movement in response to nox
ious stimulation. It is unclear whether anesthetics cause a progressive dec
rease in the number and force of limb movements evoked by noxious stimulati
on, or a step decrease (consistent with an all-or-none effect at the site o
f action). The authors hypothesized that isoflurane and halothane would pro
gressively depress the movement response.
Methods: Isoflurane minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) was determined in
rats (N = 14) using a clamp applied to a hind paw. Lateral head movements a
nd flexions of the forelimbs and hindlimbs were measured with force transdu
cers. Isoflurane was adjusted to 0.6, 0.9, 1.1, and 1.4 MAC, the noxious st
imulus applied, and the force and number of Limb and head movements determi
ned. Force and movement determinations were made in seven additional haloth
ane-anesthetized rats.
Results: Isoflurane MAC was 1.3 +/- 0.1%. In general, if movement occurred
after application of the noxious clamp, the head and all limbs were involve
d. At 0.6 MAC, the median number of extremity and head movements was 3.5 (1
0th-30th percentile, 2.0-11.4) with force generated per movement (force/mov
ement) = 6.4 (2.0-13.2) N-s. Movement number decreased to 2.1 (0.25-4.2) at
0.9 MAC (P < 0.05), but force/movement was unchanged at 4.5 (0.4-15.1) N-s
(Newton-second). At 1.1 MAC, movement number and force/movement decreased
to 0.2 CO.O1.5) and 0.1(0.0-3.2) N-s, respectively(P < 0.005). No significa
nt movement occurred at 1.4 MAC. The halothane-anesthetized rats had simila
r findings, although at 0.6 MAC they generated more movements (10.5 [5.2-19
.8]) than the rats receiving isoflurane (P < 0.05).
Conclusions: The results indicate that increasing anesthetic concentration
horn 0.6 to 0.9 MAC had little effect on the motor system controlling the f
orce of limb movements, and the neural system generating repented limb, mov
ements was depressed, consistent with a differential anesthetic effect at s
eparate sites.