Comparison of emergency room asthma care to National Guidelines

Background: National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) guidel ines were first released in 1991. To date there have been no studies publis hed comparing them with actual care given. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the documented care given i n the emergency room (ER) of an urban tertiary care hospital with 1991 NAEP P guidelines. Methods: A total of 1858 urban emergency room records with a diagnosis of a sthma or reactive airway disease were recovered in 1 year (9/95 to 8/96) fr om pediatric and adult patients seen in the ER. Ten percent (n = 181) of th e charts were reviewed for documentation of history, assessment of severity of attack, treatment given, and disposition. Results: History of present attack was documented consistently in all age g roups. Nocturnal symptoms were noted in 11%, and frequency of beta agonist use in 38% of the charts. Previous ER visits, hospitalization, ICU admissio ns, and intubations (HCUM) were documented in 70%. Accessory muscle use was recorded in 76% of the infants and 21% of the adults. Peak flows were obta ined in 31% of children and 64% of adults. Steroids were given in the ER in 59% of infants, 83% of children, and 49% of adults. Pediatric patients wer e referred to their primary care provider 90%, and to pulmonary or allergy clinic 4% of the time. Adults were referred to allergists or pulmonologists 32% of the time. Conclusion: There are significant differences in ER evaluation and treatmen t when compared with the 1991 NAEPP guidelines. Differences also exist betw een various age groups within the same institution.