This essay engages the daunting task of encapsulating and reflecting on the
25 year history of the Annual Review of Sociology. After giving a short ac
count of my own involvement in ARS, I give a brief rendition of what sociol
ogy as a field has been during the past quarter century-that is, what was "
out there" to be reflected in the pages of ARS. I lay out some statistics o
n trends in the size, countries, and universities represented, coauthorship
patterns, and gender ratios in ARS. These statistics are very informative
but contain few surprises. Next I trace and analyze an issue that has commm
anded the attention of editors of ARS throughout its history-unity or diver
sity of sociology as a discipline. Finally I conclude that the ARS does ind
eed reflect the field in ways that can be documented, but that this process
of reflection is subject to many imprecisions generated by the editorial p
rocess itself.