Hg. Beebe et al., A new pharmacological treatment for intermittent claudication: Results of a randomized, multicenter trial, ARCH IN MED, 159(17), 1999, pp. 2041-2050
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Background: Effective medication is limited for the relief of intermittent
claudication, a common manifestation of arterial occlusive disease. Cilosta
zol is a potent inhibitor of platelet aggregation with vasodilation effects
.
Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of cilostazol for the treatm
ent of intermittent claudication.
Methods: Thirty-seven outpatient vascular medicine clinics at regional tert
iary and university hospitals in the United States participated in this mul
ticenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel trial. Of
the 663 screened volunteer patients with leg discomfort, a total of 516 men
and women 40 years or older with a diagnosis of moderately severe chronic,
stable, symptomatic intermittent claudication were randomized to receive c
ilostazol, 100 mg, cilostazol, 50 mg, or placebo twice a day orally for 24
weeks. Outcome measures included pain-free and maximal walking distances vi
a treadmill testing, patient-based quality-of-life measures, global assessm
ents by patient and physician, and cardiovascular morbidity and all-cause m
ortality survival analysis.
Results: The clinical and statistical superiority of active treatment over
placebo was evident as early as week 4, with continued improvement at all s
ubsequent time points. After 24 weeks, patients who received cilostazol, 10
0 mg, twice a day had a 51% geometric mean improvement in maximal walking d
istance (P<.001 vs placebo); those who received cilostazol, 50 mg, twice a
day had a 38% geometric mean improvement in maximal walking distance (P<.00
1 vs placebo). These percentages translate into an arithmetic mean increase
in distance walked, from 129.7 m at baseline to 258.8 m at week 24 for the
cilostazol, 100 mg, group, and from 131.5 to 198.8 m for the cilostazol, 5
0 mg, group. Geometric mean change for pain-free walking distance increased
by 59% (P<.001) and 48% (P<.001), respectively, in the cilostazol, 100 mg,
and cilostazol, 50 mg, groups. These results were corroborated by the resu
lts of subjective quality-of-life assessments, functional status, and globa
l evaluations. Headache, abnormal stool samples or diarrhea, dizziness, and
palpitations were the most commonly reported potentially drug-related adve
rse events and were self-limited. A total of 75 patients (14.5%) withdrew b
ecause of any adverse event, which was equally distributed between all 3 tr
eatment groups. Similarly, there were no differences between groups in the
incidence of combined cardiovascular morbidity or all-cause mortality.
Conclusion: Compared with placebo, long-term use of cilostazol, 100 mg or 5
0 mg, twice a day significantly improves walking distances in patients with
intermittent claudication.