This article is presented as a reaction to the Nelson, Roberts, Mathur, and
Rutherford (1999) article as well as the other five follow-up articles app
earing in this Forum series. The purpose of the presentation is to expand t
he focus of the series by widening the discussion of "policy" as originally
raised in the article by Nelson and colleagues. Two critical concerns were
raised in the series: concerns about the research base for functional asse
ssment and concerns about the practicality of implementing functional asses
sment Each of these concerns is addressed within the context of speculation
about the possible functions that may have been served by mandating the us
e of functional assessment within the 1997 amendments to the Individuals wi
th Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). It is suggested that the nature of pu
blic policy may, at rimes, deserve as much of our attention as research fin
dings.