Direct and indirect cues of predation risk influence behavior and reproduction of prey: a case for acarine interactions

Citation
P. Grostal et M. Dicke, Direct and indirect cues of predation risk influence behavior and reproduction of prey: a case for acarine interactions, BEH ECOLOGY, 10(4), 1999, pp. 422-427
Citations number
49
Categorie Soggetti
Animal Sciences
Journal title
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY
ISSN journal
10452249 → ACNP
Volume
10
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
422 - 427
Database
ISI
SICI code
1045-2249(199907/08)10:4<422:DAICOP>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Little is known about the flow of chemical information from higher to lower levels within the animal food chain. However this information may determin e the behavior and distribution of many animals (e.g., that of potential pr ey) when exposed to direct and indirect cues of predation risk. We used her bivorous spider mites, Tetranychus urticae Koch (Tetranychidae) as a model to examine the foraging and oviposition decisions that prey make when expos ed to these cues. We conducted laboratory tests to determine if the previou s presence of predators (direct cues) on leaf discs or the presence of inju red conspecifics (indirect cues) alters the distribution of adults and eggs of T. urticae. When given a choice, after 24 h, fewer adults and eggs were found on leaf discs that had previously contained specialist spider mite p redators, Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot (Phytoseiidae), than on di scs unexposed to predators. Also, more T. urticae emigrated from predator-e xposed discs than from unexposed discs or from those that had previously co ntained nonpredatory mites (Tyrophagus putrescentiae, Acaridae). Finally, f ewer T. urticae foraged and laid eggs on predator-exposed discs or on those with artificially damaged conspecifics (eggs or dead adults) than on discs with intact conspecifics. Tetranychus urticae probably recognizes infochem icals (kairomones) from its predators or cues from injured spider mites and consequently avoids feeding or ovipositing in areas exposed to these cues. Recognition and avoidance of kairomones from specialist predators by this prey are likely to be hereditary, but avoidance of injured conspecifics may be an adaptation to avoid predators that are not inherently recognized. We discuss the behavioral and ecological implications of our findings.