The number of people with mental disorders living in the community has rece
ntly increased with further increases likely. This study provides a post-at
titudinal examination of the discursive resources on which ordinary New Zea
landers draw when talking about 'community care'. Four common resources wer
e identified: dual community, rights, disorder and patronization. Each of t
hese resources is examined by using a range of analytic concepts which illu
strate the rhetorical achievements and social practices found in the data.
We argue that the dual community resource works to position the disordered
as being outside the community which is contrary to the broad aim of commun
ity care. The analysis of talk of rights was cast as an ideological dilemma
for participants who endorsed both universality and conditionality of righ
ts for the disordered. The disorder resource was notable for its flexible r
hetorical deployment, while patronization contributed to the positioning of
the disordered as subordinate. The implications of these resources are dis
cussed in terms of existing notions of stigma and possibilities for change
centred around affiliative resources.