N. Bruining et al., Quantitative measurements of in-stent restenosis: A comparison between quantitative coronary ultrasound and quantitative coronary angiography, CATHET C IN, 48(2), 1999, pp. 133-142
While quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) remains the standard used to
assess new interventional therapies, intracoronary ultrasound (ICUS) is gai
ning interest. The aim of the study was to determine the relationship betwe
en QCA and quantitative coronary ultrasound (QCU) measurements after stenti
ng. Sixty-two consecutive patients with both QCA and QCU analysis after ste
nt implantation were included in the study. The mean luminal diameter (QCU
vs. QCA) were 2.74 +/- 0.46 mm and 2.41 +/- 0.49 mm (P < 0.0001), the minim
al luminal diameter (MLD) 2.08 +/- 0.44 mm and 1.62 +/- 0.42 mm (P < 0.0001
), and the projected QCU MLD 1.90 +/- 0.42 mm (P < 0.0001 with respect to Q
CA). Percentage obstruction diameter (QCU vs. QCA) were 41.53% +/- 10.78% a
nd 43.15% +/- 12.72% (P = NS). The stent diameter (QCU vs, QCA) were 3.54 /- 0.65 mm and 3.80 +/- 0.37 mm (P = 0.0004). Stent length measured by QCU
were longer at 31.11 +/- 13.54 mm against 28.63 +/- 12.75 mm, P < 0.0001 wi
th respect to QCA. In conclusion, while QCA and QCU appear to be comparable
tools for measuring corrected stent diameters and stent lengths, smaller l
uminal diameters were found using QCA. This is of particular relevance to q
uantitative studies addressing absolute changes in vascular or luminal diam
eters. (C) 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.