Caricatures, which increase the distinctiveness of faces, are generall
y recognised at least as well as undistorted images of those faces. Ho
wever, caricatures seem to facilitate recognition more for some faces
than others. An investigation was made into whether the effectiveness
of caricaturing depends on a face's initial distinctiveness. In experi
ments 1-3, subjects learned names for unfamiliar faces (photographs) t
hat varied in distinctiveness, and were tested on recognition of caric
atures, anticaricatures, and undistorted images of those faces. The te
st images were line drawings in experiments 1 and 2 and photographic i
mages in experiment 3. Experiments 1 and 2 were identical except that
subjects had more exposure to the study photographs in experiment 1. I
n all three experiments, distinctive faces were recognised (named) mor
e accurately than less-distinctive faces, and caricatures were recogni
sed at least as accurately as undistorted images and better than antic
aricatures. However, distinctiveness and caricature level did not inte
ract. Nor did a face's initial distinctiveness correlate with the degr
ee of recognition facilitation produced by caricaturing (experiments 1
-3) or with the caricature level chosen as the best likeness (experime
nt 4). The effectiveness of caricatures varied across faces and experi
mental conditions, but these differences did not relate to differences
in initial distinctiveness. These results prompted a more careful ana
lysis of the expected relationship between initial distinctiveness and
the power of caricatures, which indicated that the relationship may b
e curvilinear rather than linear. In addition, it was found that line-
drawing caricatures functioned as superportraits (recognised better th
an undistorted images-experiment 1) but photographic caricatures did n
ot (experiment 3), suggesting that the forensic potential of caricatur
es may be limited.