Trimipramine fails to exert antimanic efficacy: A case of the discrepancy between in vitro rationale and clinical efficacy

Citation
H. Grunze et al., Trimipramine fails to exert antimanic efficacy: A case of the discrepancy between in vitro rationale and clinical efficacy, CLIN NEUROP, 22(5), 1999, pp. 298-300
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
CLINICAL NEUROPHARMACOLOGY
ISSN journal
03625664 → ACNP
Volume
22
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
298 - 300
Database
ISI
SICI code
0362-5664(199909/10)22:5<298:TFTEAE>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
Standard mood stabilizers, such as lithium and haloperidol, and anticonvuls ants show effectiveness in a maximum of 60%-70% of acutely manic patients. Obviously, there is a clinical need to evaluate other treatment options. Cu rrent pathophysiologic concepts suggest that substances with an amelioratin g effect on dopaminergic hyperfunction, serotonergic hypofunction, or GABAe rgic hypofunction might be useful, as may be substances with calcium-antago nistic effects. In vitro, the antidepressant trimipramine exerts dopamine- and calcium-antagonistic properties. Therefore, we conducted an open trial to screen it for antimanic action. We found no clinical benefit in four acu tely manic patients receiving up to 400 mg/d of trimipramine. It is conclud ed that, at least in the case of trimipramine, the pharmacologic profile is not helpful in predicting potential effectiveness in mania.