H. Grunze et al., Trimipramine fails to exert antimanic efficacy: A case of the discrepancy between in vitro rationale and clinical efficacy, CLIN NEUROP, 22(5), 1999, pp. 298-300
Standard mood stabilizers, such as lithium and haloperidol, and anticonvuls
ants show effectiveness in a maximum of 60%-70% of acutely manic patients.
Obviously, there is a clinical need to evaluate other treatment options. Cu
rrent pathophysiologic concepts suggest that substances with an amelioratin
g effect on dopaminergic hyperfunction, serotonergic hypofunction, or GABAe
rgic hypofunction might be useful, as may be substances with calcium-antago
nistic effects. In vitro, the antidepressant trimipramine exerts dopamine-
and calcium-antagonistic properties. Therefore, we conducted an open trial
to screen it for antimanic action. We found no clinical benefit in four acu
tely manic patients receiving up to 400 mg/d of trimipramine. It is conclud
ed that, at least in the case of trimipramine, the pharmacologic profile is
not helpful in predicting potential effectiveness in mania.