S. Sauberlich et al., Cell culture tests for assessing the tolerance of soft tissue to variouslymodified titanium surfaces, CLIN OR IMP, 10(5), 1999, pp. 379-393
The aim of our research project was to achieve an improvement in the integr
ation of enossal dental implants in the region of peri-implantary soft tiss
ue. Improvement in the adhesion of the gingiva to the surface of enossal im
plants was to be achieved by modification of the titanium surface. The effe
ct of different modifications on the biocompatibility of the modified titan
ium surfaces was tested: sulfur dioxide plasma treatment of titanium; acety
lene plasma treatment of titanium followed by sulfur dioxide plasma etching
; plasma nitration of titanium; replacement of titanium by glycidoxypropylt
rimethoxy silane; coating titanium with poly[(ethene-co-vinyl acetate)-graf
t-vinyl chloride] and coating titanium with fibronectin. Determination of t
he chemical composition of the surface was carried out using X-ray photospe
ctroscopy. The adsorption of fibronectin at the surface of the titanium was
tested using an Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay. In selected in vitro te
sts with human gingival fibroblasts, cell morphology was assessed using sca
nning electron microscopy and light microscopy. Cell proliferation and prot
ein synthesis, as well as the activity of mitochondrial dehydrogenases were
evaluated. By means of centrifugation and by determining initial cell adhe
sion, the adhesion of gingival fibroblasts was investigated. According to t
he kind of modification made to the titanium surfaces, it was possible to o
bserve differences in the cellular behavior of gingiva fibroblasts on the d
ifferently modified surfaces of the implants. Coating the titanium using fi
bronectin produced optimization of cell growth and improvement in the adhes
ion of gingiva fibroblasts to the implant surface. In contrast, modificatio
n of the titanium with poly[(ethene-co-vinyl acetate)-graft-vinyl chloride]
generally resulted in a deterioration of the biocompatibility of the surfa
ce. A marked correlation between the cellular compatibility of the modified
titanium and the surface modification made did not become apparent. One re
ason for this is the large number of parameters determining the interaction
between implant and tissue.