R. Danesi et al., Pharmacokinetic optimisation of treatment schedules for anthracyclines andpaclitaxel in patients with cancer, CLIN PHARMA, 37(3), 1999, pp. 195-211
The integration of paclitaxel into chemotherapy regimens with anthracycline
s offers a new opportunity for devising effective therapy for patients with
breast cancer. High response rates have been obtained by combining epirubi
cin or doxorubicin with paclitaxel. The pharmacokinetic analysis of paclita
xel and anthracyclines, as well as the identification of relationships with
their pharmacodynamics, represents a rational approach for treatment optim
isation.
A schedule-dependent interaction between paclitaxel and anthracyclines has
been demonstrated in clinical pharmacokinetic studies. In patients given pa
clitaxel 125 to 200 mg/m(2) as 3- to 24-hour infusions in combination with
doxorubicin 48 to 60 mg/m(2) as a 48-hour infusion or intravenous bolus, th
e peak plasma drug concentration (C-max of doxorubicin increased significan
tly and drug clearance was reduced in the sequence paclitaxel --> doxorubic
in as compared with doxorubicin --> paclitaxel. The schedule paclitaxel -->
doxorubicin was more toxic as compared with doxorubicin --> paclitaxel, an
d an incidence of 18 to 20% of congestive heart failure was observed in pat
ients with breast cancer given doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 followed by paclitaxel
125 to 200 mg/m(2)
Likewise. patients given epirubicin 90 mg/m(2) had a sudden rebound of epir
ubicinol plasma concentrations shortly after the start of infusion of pacli
taxel 200 mg/m2, with a significant increase in the area under the concentr
ation-time curve (AUC) of epirubicinol as compared with epirubicin alone (1
.27 +/- 0.2 vs 0.61 +/- 0.1 mu mol/L.h). Moreover, the severity of the myel
osuppression induced by paclitaxel, as defined by a sigmoid maximum effect
(E-max) relationship between the decrease in neutrophil count and the durat
ion of drug plasma concentrations above the threshold value of 0.1 mu mol/L
, was significantly enhanced by epirubicin.
Finally, chemotherapy with paclitaxel and anthracyclines may be improved by
designing pharmacologically guided regimens in order to control the extent
of pharmacokinetic interaction and reduce the risk of severe toxicity whil
e maintaining the therapeutic efficacy of the combination. Future protocols
should explore the activity of a prolonged paclitaxel infusion in associat
ion with an anthracycline separated from the taxane by a washout time inter
val in order to minimise the inhibitory effects exerted by paclitaxel on P-
glycoprotein-mediated biliary clearance of anthiacyclines, the most likely
cause of pharmacokinetic interaction.