Pharmacokinetic optimisation of treatment schedules for anthracyclines andpaclitaxel in patients with cancer

Citation
R. Danesi et al., Pharmacokinetic optimisation of treatment schedules for anthracyclines andpaclitaxel in patients with cancer, CLIN PHARMA, 37(3), 1999, pp. 195-211
Citations number
61
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology,"Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS
ISSN journal
03125963 → ACNP
Volume
37
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
195 - 211
Database
ISI
SICI code
0312-5963(199909)37:3<195:POOTSF>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
The integration of paclitaxel into chemotherapy regimens with anthracycline s offers a new opportunity for devising effective therapy for patients with breast cancer. High response rates have been obtained by combining epirubi cin or doxorubicin with paclitaxel. The pharmacokinetic analysis of paclita xel and anthracyclines, as well as the identification of relationships with their pharmacodynamics, represents a rational approach for treatment optim isation. A schedule-dependent interaction between paclitaxel and anthracyclines has been demonstrated in clinical pharmacokinetic studies. In patients given pa clitaxel 125 to 200 mg/m(2) as 3- to 24-hour infusions in combination with doxorubicin 48 to 60 mg/m(2) as a 48-hour infusion or intravenous bolus, th e peak plasma drug concentration (C-max of doxorubicin increased significan tly and drug clearance was reduced in the sequence paclitaxel --> doxorubic in as compared with doxorubicin --> paclitaxel. The schedule paclitaxel --> doxorubicin was more toxic as compared with doxorubicin --> paclitaxel, an d an incidence of 18 to 20% of congestive heart failure was observed in pat ients with breast cancer given doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 followed by paclitaxel 125 to 200 mg/m(2) Likewise. patients given epirubicin 90 mg/m(2) had a sudden rebound of epir ubicinol plasma concentrations shortly after the start of infusion of pacli taxel 200 mg/m2, with a significant increase in the area under the concentr ation-time curve (AUC) of epirubicinol as compared with epirubicin alone (1 .27 +/- 0.2 vs 0.61 +/- 0.1 mu mol/L.h). Moreover, the severity of the myel osuppression induced by paclitaxel, as defined by a sigmoid maximum effect (E-max) relationship between the decrease in neutrophil count and the durat ion of drug plasma concentrations above the threshold value of 0.1 mu mol/L , was significantly enhanced by epirubicin. Finally, chemotherapy with paclitaxel and anthracyclines may be improved by designing pharmacologically guided regimens in order to control the extent of pharmacokinetic interaction and reduce the risk of severe toxicity whil e maintaining the therapeutic efficacy of the combination. Future protocols should explore the activity of a prolonged paclitaxel infusion in associat ion with an anthracycline separated from the taxane by a washout time inter val in order to minimise the inhibitory effects exerted by paclitaxel on P- glycoprotein-mediated biliary clearance of anthiacyclines, the most likely cause of pharmacokinetic interaction.