Sa. Karl et Bw. Bowen, Evolutionary significant units versus geopolitical taxonomy: Molecular systematics of an endangered sea turtle (genus Chelonia), CONSER BIOL, 13(5), 1999, pp. 990-999
Taxonomic rank is an important criterion in assessing the conservation prio
rity of an endangered organism: the sole member of a distinct family will g
enerally receive a higher priority than a semi-isolated population in a pol
ytypic species. When cryptic evolutionary partitions are discovered in enda
ngered species, these findings are heralded as a positive step in the conse
rvation process. The opposite action, demoting the taxonomic rank of an end
angered organism, can be resisted by the conservation community because it
is perceived as detrimental to preservation efforts. We explore the argumen
ts for and against the species status of the endangered black turtle (Chelo
nia agassizii) and contribute an additional data set based on DNA sequences
of single-copy nuclear loci. These data are concordant with previous mtDNA
surveys in indicating no evolutionary distinction between C. agassizii and
adjacent green turtle (C. mydas) populations. Although the black turtle is
morphologically identifiable at a low level, much of its distinction is ba
sed on size and color differences that are highly variable throughout the r
ange of C. mydas. Thus the black turtle would be more accurately classified
at the subspecific or population level. There is no strong scientific case
available to defend the species status of C. agassizii, and yet that desig
nation has persisted for over a century. We suggest that the maintenance of
this name is based on geographical and political considerations, and we pr
opose a pragmatic category for this type of taxonomy: the geopolitical spec
ies. Furthermore, we argue against the practice of preserving species statu
s for conservation purposes. There are several good reasons to preserve the
black turtle, including morphological diversity and the possibility that i
t is an incipient evolutionary lineage with novel adaptations; taxonomic ra
nk, however, is not one of them.