Population declines may be inferred from a decrease in the number of sites
at which a species is detected. Although such presence-absence data often a
re interpreted informally, it is simple to test the statistical significanc
e of changes in the number of sites occupied by a species. I used simulatio
ns to examine the statistical power (i.e. the probability of making the Typ
e II error that no population decline has occurred when the population actu
ally has declined) of presence-absence designs. Most presence-absence desig
ns have low power to detect declines of <20-50% in populations but have ade
quate power to detect steeper declines. Power was greater if the population
disappeared entirely from a subset of formerly occupied sites than if it d
eclined evenly over its entire range. Power also rose with (1) increases in
the number of sites surveyed (2) increases in population density or sampli
ng effort at a site; and (3) decreases in spatial variance in population de
nsity. Because of potential problems with bias and inadequate power, presen
ce-absence designs should be used and interpreted cautiously.