Darwin's On the Origin of Species and George Eliot's Middlemarch are both c
oncerned with the same question: what makes history happen? To a point, the
ir answers are similar. History for both is nonteleological, contingent and
interconnected. Lf history has no direction and individuals are virtually
powerless, what hope of progress is there? Darwin leaves the point unresolv
ed. Eliot finds an answer for human beings alone: while animals, always sub
ject to natural selection, may be incapable of true altruism, human beings,
with consciousness and conscience, can choose selflessness, acting contrar
y to their own instincts in the interest of abstract morality.