A three-way treatment design is used to compare contingent valuation respon
se formats. Respondents are asked to value an endangered species (the red-c
ockaded woodpecker) and the restoration of its habitat following a natural
disaster. For three question formats (open-ended, payment card, and double-
bounded dichotomous choice), differences in survey response rates, item non
-response rates, and protest bids are examined. Bootstrap techniques are us
ed to compare means across formats and to explore differences in willingnes
s to pay (WTP) distribution functions. Convergent validity is found in a co
mparison of mean WTP values, although some differences are apparent in the
cumulative distribution functions. Differences across formats are also iden
tified in item non-response rates and proportion of protest bids. Overall,
the payment card format exhibits desirable properties relative to the other
two formats.