Does question format matter? Valuing an endangered species

Citation
Dw. Reaves et al., Does question format matter? Valuing an endangered species, ENVIRON R E, 14(3), 1999, pp. 365-383
Citations number
50
Categorie Soggetti
Economics
Journal title
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS
ISSN journal
09246460 → ACNP
Volume
14
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
365 - 383
Database
ISI
SICI code
0924-6460(199910)14:3<365:DQFMVA>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
A three-way treatment design is used to compare contingent valuation respon se formats. Respondents are asked to value an endangered species (the red-c ockaded woodpecker) and the restoration of its habitat following a natural disaster. For three question formats (open-ended, payment card, and double- bounded dichotomous choice), differences in survey response rates, item non -response rates, and protest bids are examined. Bootstrap techniques are us ed to compare means across formats and to explore differences in willingnes s to pay (WTP) distribution functions. Convergent validity is found in a co mparison of mean WTP values, although some differences are apparent in the cumulative distribution functions. Differences across formats are also iden tified in item non-response rates and proportion of protest bids. Overall, the payment card format exhibits desirable properties relative to the other two formats.