U. Alexy et al., Development of scores to measure the effects of nutrition counselling on the overall diet: A pilot study in children and adolescents, EUR J NUTR, 38(4), 1999, pp. 196-200
An intervention study by documented dietary counselling was carried out in
a sample of 9 children and adolescents (12-15 years) living in a full-time
institution in Dortmund. Three weighed dietary records were collected over
3-7 days, one before and one after each of two individual nutrition counsel
ling sessions, which were based on the recommended intake of food groups de
fined by the Optimized Mixed Diet (OMD), a quantitative preventive dietary
conception for children and adolescents. As univariate dietary parameters (
e.g., cholesterol intake), which are often used to show the effectiveness o
f nutrition counselling, do not take into account the multivariate complexi
ty of nutrition, we developed 3 multivariate scores to measure the effectiv
eness of nutrition counselling. They are defined as:
Recommended Food group change Score (RFS): Average change in the amounts of
the deviations (%) from the reference food groups values (OMD = 100 %) bef
ore and after counselling taking into account the aim (ear more/less) of th
e counselling session, exclusively based on the food groups addressed durin
g counselling.
Total Food group change Score (TFS): Average change in the amounts of the d
eviations (%) from the reference food group values (OMD = 100 %) before and
after counselling based on all food groups consumed.
Nutrient Improvement Score (NIS): Average change in the negative deviations
(%) of 8 vitamins and 8 minerals from the German reference values for nutr
ient intake (Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Ernahrung (DGE) = 100 %) before and
after counselling.
On average, the intakes of the food groups mentioned during the first couns
elling session improved considerably (RFS = +36 %), the change in the intak
e of all food groups was Small (TFS = +6 %) and the nutrient intakes did no
t improve (NIS = 0 %).
From the second counselling session the value of the RFS was +10 %, of the
TFS was +6 % and of the NTS +3 %.
This means that the success of counselling on one dietary criterion does no
t guarantee success on others. Our food and nutrient based scores together
with a detailed food intake assessment give an example of multivariate meas
urements of nutrition counselling outcomes.